Re: [ngIRCd-ML] ngIRCd 20~rc1

Alexander Barton wrote...

Hm, I think the "correct" fix is the one in commit 8061056c, no?

That one does the trick, too. RFC 1925 (1) applies. Looking briefly at the other commits since ~rc1, I'd suggest an ~rc2 based on the current HEAD. A different question, was this a test whether anybody actually tries release candidates? :-> Christoph