19 Nov
2012
19 Nov
'12
10:08
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Alexander Barton wrote...
Hm, I think the "correct" fix is the one in commit 8061056c, no?
That one does the trick, too. RFC 1925 (1) applies. Looking briefly at the other commits since ~rc1, I'd suggest an ~rc2 based on the current HEAD.
I thought about that, too, and I hope to find some time to create a 20~rc2 release today ...
A different question, was this a test whether anybody actually tries release candidates? :->
Huhm ... ;-)
Regards Alex